Project

General

Profile

Actions

Bug #17219

closed

refactor scripts that move old packages to attic repos

Added by Ward Vandewege almost 4 years ago. Updated almost 4 years ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Assigned To:
Category:
-
Target version:
Start date:
01/04/2021
Due date:
% Done:

100%

Estimated time:
(Total: 0.00 h)
Story points:
-

Description

This script is called from a jenkins job, see https://ci.arvados.org/job/monthly-repository-move-packages-from-dev-attic/

The invocation path seems needlessly convoluted, and the scripts used are not public. Refactor and move to the resulting script(s) to the arvados-dev repo.


Subtasks 1 (0 open1 closed)

Task #17230: review 17219-refactor-attic-scriptsResolvedWard Vandewege01/04/2021

Actions

Related issues 1 (0 open1 closed)

Related to Arvados - Feature #17218: debian package repos: switch from freight to something fasterResolvedWard Vandewege

Actions
Actions #1

Updated by Ward Vandewege almost 4 years ago

  • Related to Feature #17218: debian package repos: switch from freight to something faster added
Actions #2

Updated by Ward Vandewege almost 4 years ago

  • Status changed from New to In Progress
Actions #3

Updated by Ward Vandewege almost 4 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)
Actions #4

Updated by Ward Vandewege almost 4 years ago

Ready for review in commit:406aeeef5614f60844d92bed6d6aa3440547d077 on branch 17219-refactor-attic-scripts (arvados-dev).

I intend to call this directly from https://ci.arvados.org/job/monthly-repository-move-packages-from-dev-attic/, eliminating the glue script on disk in the process.

Actions #5

Updated by Nico César almost 4 years ago

review at commit:406aeeef5614f60844d92bed6d6aa3440547d077

I think we can remove DebugExecutor(), the original idea was to have a --debug that will use that class. Right now is an evolutionary leftover, like an appendix.

Besides that looks fairly straight forward, we had the default='2017-06-31' because we started around that time, we can update that to something that makes sense now. but probably in production we'll always have a '--cutoff_date' parameter explicit

Actions #6

Updated by Ward Vandewege almost 4 years ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
  • % Done changed from 0 to 100
Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF