Arvados

Note this doesn't make sense to do for as long as we do #23062.

Tom Clegg wrote in #note-8:

23023-published-ports-docs @ d0e6de9e2040d6c603a16fe33c0b01cc4a2bbdda -- developer-run-tests: #4840

One readability nit: for the container example, I think it would be helpful to underline again that these fields only appear on running containers. I know it's mentioned above the table, but since this is reference documentation readers will probably skim for the thing that looks most helpful to them and may not read it all the way through. And while we're at it, this is even less pressing but I don't think we should relegate "(container request)" and "(container)" to parentheticals since they're pretty critical information. Suggest: "Example published_ports attribute for a container request" and "Example published_ports attribute for a running container," but I'm open to further wordsmithing.

This is not critical. Please merge whether you take this verbatim, with tweaks, or would rather not. Thanks.