Arvados

Peter Amstutz wrote in #note-1:

I suspect this is resolved but let's check on it again?

Still an issue as of v3.2.0~dev20250813152832. If your cursor is a pointing hand, it will do the right thing. But you can click inside the cell, outside that range, and see the buggy behavior. IMO the pointy finger behavior should extend to the entire row cell.

Related: https://dev.arvados.org/issues/21315#note-6

Lisa Knox wrote in #note-7:

Related: https://dev.arvados.org/issues/21315#note-6

We talked about how the current behavior is intentional. However, I think it surprises users and is destructive. We could not find examples of other software behaving this way.

Wanting a way to start a new selection fresh is understandable. The standard ways to do that are:

• Right-click an item outside the current selection.
• Deselect everything using the "Select All" button in the column header.

We support both of these, although both could also use a little refinement (in separate tickets).

21746-checkbox-behavior @ 6472185c92c10cbc87add9e1f7920895458a50e0

developer-run-tests-services-workbench2: #1584

• ✅ All agreed upon points are implemented / addressed.
  • For the record, the decision was made in discussion to only use the finger pointer on clickable links within the table row, not for the entire table row.
• ✅ Anything not implemented (discovered or discussed during work) has a follow-up story.
  • #23121
• ✅ Code is tested and passing, both automated and manual, what manual testing was done is described
• ✅ The tested code incorporates recent main branch changes.
• ✅ New or changed UX/UX and has gotten feedback from stakeholders.
  • The change in selection highlighting has not yet been approved by stakeholders
• n/a Documentation has been updated.
• ✅ Behaves appropriately at the intended scale (describe intended scale).
• ✅ Considered backwards and forwards compatibility issues between client and server.
• ✅ Follows our coding standards and GUI style guidelines.

Also, I suggest that #23113 be delayed until this branch is merged

Edit: wrong issue

This lgtm!